Capital Efficiency & Velocity
In-House Hiring vs. HP Edit Sprints
Compare the true financial expenditure of full-time hiring—including recruiting commissions, payroll taxes, healthcare, and onboarding lag—against dedicated HP Edit sprint execution.
Configure In-House Comparison
2. In-House Engineering Headcount2 Senior Engineers
1 Lead Engineer2 Engineers (Standard)5 Full Swarm
3. Traditional Project Scope Horizon6 Months
2 Months (Fast MVP)6 Months (Platform)12 Months (Enterprise)
In-House Hidden Hiring Surcharges (Calculated)
Base Salary
$165,000
Benefits / Taxes
+$46,200
Recruiter Fees
+$44,000
2.5-Mo Onboarding Lag
+$68,750
Verified ROI Verdict92% Cost Reduction
Estimated Net Capital Saved:
$306,310
Delivered 14 Weeks Faster
Traditional In-House Hiring (6 mos)$331,150
HP Edit Enterprise Sprint (2.7 mos)$24,840
Zero equity dilution & 0% recruiter commissions
100% full source code ownership on day of handover
Sub-100ms enterprise architectures & SOC2 compliance ready